Originally posted by Mystic3D
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2018+ XStar prop thread.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by wallnut21 View PostAny real-world experience with Acme 3289 or OJ 799-MF on X24?
I picked up an Acme 3493 18x15.5, 0.09 cup and ran it this weekend. I did not do a full test in all scenarios, but it is a rocket out of the hole. I did hit the rev limiter and top speed was 35.4 at 5650 rpms. I cannot remember the exact surf RPM, but I think it was ~ 3500 with full ballast and 14 on the boat.
While I love the performance of the 3493, I just placed an order for the Acme 3289 18x17.5 0.105 and should have it next week. I will do some more testing and report all of my findings on all three props (actually never ran the factory OJ).Last edited by Diesel; 06-01-2021, 12:23 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mystic3D View PostJust ordered an OJ #799 18x17 from Eric for a 2019 Xstar. Will report back on the difference.
2019 XStar
changed stock prop OJ 18x16 to OJ 18x17
Easy to get on plane with Full Ballast
I did not get Surf RPM's as I was Surfing ;-)
Gained a few MPH at cruising speed
Tip: Eric at OJ sent me a "shouldered" Prop Nut, think basically a washer built into the nut, hope this helps with the prop getting loose.
Leave a comment:
-
This was all at table Rock lake.
Same yesterday. Dropped down to 11.2-11.5 for some foiling sessions and was running about 3250-3350. Hope this helps a touch. Very pleased.
Plenty of power also. Full ballast and up to wake speed at 22.5 mph zero issues.
Leave a comment:
-
More info
Originally posted by coloradox45 View PostOut today- here is data-
2018 with 6.2L
3 adults in boat
100% full ballast
600 lbs of lead- 300 each side under tower arms
Acme 3319 prop
12.2 mph with 60% tab
3500-3550 rpm
Will check and update tomorrow with slower speeds, but super please. Ran around on the lake at 28.5 mph at 4200 rpm. Will swap to the OJ 899 at some point in the next few weeks and see if what differences that makes.
I see you are in the mountains. What was the elevation? Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Out today- here is data-
2018 with 6.2L
3 adults in boat
100% full ballast
600 lbs of lead- 300 each side under tower arms
Acme 3319 prop
12.2 mph with 60% tab
3500-3550 rpm
Will check and update tomorrow with slower speeds, but super please. Ran around on the lake at 28.5 mph at 4200 rpm. Will swap to the OJ 899 at some point in the next few weeks and see if what differences that makes.
Leave a comment:
-
Just ordered an OJ #799 18x17 from Eric for a 2019 Xstar. Will report back on the difference.
Leave a comment:
-
By my count there are about 4 different prop recommendations throughout this thread.
I have only seen real-world data/experience form one - which is the Acme 3289 18x17.5, in which there was reported a reduction of several hundred RPM's, reduction of ~2GPH while surfing, but decreased whole shot- which is deemed acceptable unless maybe you are at high elevation.
still looking for real world feedback on the:
OJ 18x15.5 - Variable pitch prop that might lower surf RPM and gain whole shot (magic prop)
OJ 799-MF - 18x17 - less aggressive than stock prop, but not as drastic of a change as the Acme 3289, so might be a good middle ground for those who run at elevation or heavy wakeboard.
Acme 3319 - 18x16 (same specs as stock prop) but might lower surf RPM's because of new shape.
Leave a comment:
-
About to order another new prop for the new boat that will be coming in july. Figured I would check back in on this thread and see what everyones thoughts were. Seems the 3289 is still the prop for me and my use.
I am still up in the air on if I will do the 6.2 again, or if i might opt for the 7.4 just for something different this year. If 7.4, I will probaly go 3289 for sure. If 6.2, I might try the OJ 18x17. If I do, i'll let you all know what I find and post it in this thread. I have a dicom now, so I can probably tell you exactly what the fuel burn difference is.... (If i find time to hook the computer up before and after.)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Black ‘n Green View PostWe installed the 3289 on our 2021 XStar and went out and surfed. Here is what we experienced:
We carry 1k in lead, 900lbs midship, 100lbs in the nose.
All tanks full, including fuel and three adults onboard.
Steep tab settings and 11.3 mph.
We ran for 3.2 hours, all surf.
Burned 22.9 gallons of fuel.
RPMs were 3300-3350 depending on travel direction
7.15 gph
Stock prop, same setup and conditions were 3600-3650 burning 9.10 gph.
Great feedback
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Acme 3289 prop swap
We installed the 3289 on our 2021 XStar and went out and surfed. Here is what we experienced:
We carry 1k in lead, 900lbs midship, 100lbs in the nose.
All tanks full, including fuel and three adults onboard.
Steep tab settings and 11.3 mph.
We ran for 3.2 hours, all surf.
Burned 22.9 gallons of fuel.
RPMs were 3300-3350 depending on travel direction
7.15 gph
Stock prop, same setup and conditions were 3600-3650 burning 9.10 gph.
Leave a comment:
-
2018+ XStar prop thread.
Originally posted by lonniehod1982 View PostI emailed an online prop retailer and they suggested that if I make this change my fuel consumption may actually go up while surfing. Thoughts? Engine having to "work harder"?
That has been discussed on this forum before- you are not the first person to be told that. Maybe it’s true but I have Not heard any real world experience with that happening. As long as you are not going crazy and moving to a crazy prop and keeping the rpm’s within reason- I don’t see that happening.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by maniacmikes; 05-08-2021, 02:02 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I emailed an online prop retailer and they suggested that if I make this change my fuel consumption may actually go up while surfing. Thoughts? Engine having to "work harder"? blender guideLast edited by lonniehod1982; 12-22-2020, 12:07 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: