Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official: "Its College Football Season" Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by MC25 View Post
    Alabama players could murder someone on the field, and ol boy would still defend them.
    I went to A&M...I also have shots of Tim Williams getting held. It happens every single game. I don't blame officials for a loss because they suck equally.

    Comment


    • Don't get me wrong, not saying the officials changed the outcome of the game, just saying it would have been a much different game if #30 on Bama was ejected, Jalen didn't score, etc etc


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      2020 Table Rock Mastercraft Reunion Poker Run Champion

      I lead the fight to ban the swimsuit thread, help me bring it back: https://teamtalk.mastercraft.com/sho...58#post1494758

      "LDA never saw a thread he couldn't run off the rails"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by lda6339 View Post
        Don't get me wrong, not saying the officials changed the outcome of the game, just saying it would have been a much different game if #30 on Bama was ejected, Jalen didn't score, etc etc


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        A&M des the same thing almost every year. They win the first easy games and then when they get into the meat of their schedule they collapse. One call doesn't change the outcome of the game

        Comment


        • Originally posted by lda6339 View Post
          Don't get me wrong, not saying the officials changed the outcome of the game, just saying it would have been a much different game if #30 on Bama was ejected, Jalen didn't score, etc etc


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Shoulda, coulda, woulda
          -Tim

          Making boomers great again!! Boomin'

          Comment


          • Originally posted by lda6339 View Post
            Don't get me wrong, not saying the officials changed the outcome of the game, just saying it would have been a much different game if #30 on Bama was ejected, Jalen didn't score, etc etc


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            From what was said today it was not targeting because he was a runner and not a defenseless player. Don't hammer me on that because I can't figure out what is and is not targeting half the time they call it. I don't think anyone truly understands that rule and how it is enforced. As for what would have happened if Mack Wilson (30) had been ejected? Not much, only plays special teams and comes in for mop up. True freshman.

            I have the photos from the back side of that play and watched the video several times. That frame is from the play it just looked wrong because of the wall in the background was not what you would normally see from a shot going back (North End Zone has a taller wall with a fence on it, South has that short wall). It also looks like that was a very fleeting part of the play. I don't think he had the angle on that one but I know how frustrating it is. I watched that match up all day as those two will probably both be top 5 in the draft.

            If stupid Photobucket wasn't down I have some other images that show just how bad the officials are. We actually joke about putting up galleries of missed calls - might lose our credentials though.

            On a side note, I stood next to Miles and Hall as they warmed up taking a few shots for my son (MG his favorite player). Unreal how quick they are for their size. Those two are going to make lots of money. They were also very nice after the game.

            Comment


            • My understanding is that targeting can be helmet to helmet of a defenseless player or crown of the helmet to helmet of any player.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              2020 Table Rock Mastercraft Reunion Poker Run Champion

              I lead the fight to ban the swimsuit thread, help me bring it back: https://teamtalk.mastercraft.com/sho...58#post1494758

              "LDA never saw a thread he couldn't run off the rails"

              Comment


              • Originally posted by lda6339 View Post
                My understanding is that targeting can be helmet to helmet of a defenseless player or crown of the helmet to helmet of any player.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                I thought that was the case as well but being a runner seems to make a difference. The SEC office and the head of officials at the game made that point. I was listening to satellite radio College Sports channel and they were blasting the rule today because it seems to be interpreted by officials differently.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Mastercraftdave View Post
                  A&M des the same thing almost every year. They win the first easy games and then when they get into the meat of their schedule they collapse. One call doesn't change the outcome of the game
                  It was WAY more than one call. #30 did the same thing again on the next punt return by the Aggies and they cut to a commercial break REAL quick when the officials ignored that one too.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by stuartmcnair View Post
                    I thought that was the case as well but being a runner seems to make a difference. The SEC office and the head of officials at the game made that point. I was listening to satellite radio College Sports channel and they were blasting the rule today because it seems to be interpreted by officials differently.
                    Quoted from the NCAA 2016 Rulebook:

                    "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul."

                    This specifies a hit with the top of the helmet, but not necessarily a hit to the opponent’s helmet.

                    Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:

                    Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
                    A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
                    Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
                    Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet.

                    Enough Said. There is no mention of ball carrier or not. It was targeting, and they didn't call it. It's possible to beat the #1 ranked team, but you can't beat the refs.

                    Comment


                    • I was at the Texas Tech vs OU game Saturday night. Unbelievable offensive show and to see so many NCAA records set was a bonus.

                      Comment


                      • Tech fans spitting at/on as well as throwing chewing tobacco cans at Baker Mayfield was pretty trashy. But I've never heard good things about those fans


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                        2020 Table Rock Mastercraft Reunion Poker Run Champion

                        I lead the fight to ban the swimsuit thread, help me bring it back: https://teamtalk.mastercraft.com/sho...58#post1494758

                        "LDA never saw a thread he couldn't run off the rails"

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Olaff View Post
                          Quoted from the NCAA 2016 Rulebook:

                          "No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul."

                          This specifies a hit with the top of the helmet, but not necessarily a hit to the opponent’s helmet.

                          Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:

                          Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
                          A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
                          Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
                          Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet.

                          Enough Said. There is no mention of ball carrier or not. It was targeting, and they didn't call it. It's possible to beat the #1 ranked team, but you can't beat the refs.
                          So, this should have been targeting? Forearm to helmet and all...quit *****ing about the refs. As I said, they suck for everyone.

                          Comment


                          • Keep worrying about the officiating. The reality is this: after moving the ball 75 yards on seven plays to take a 14-13 lead, A&M ran 30 plays in the final 28 minutes for a total of 52 yards and zero points. That's 1.7 yards per play. Combine that with a turnover that generated points, and there's a very small chance to win. Even smaller when playing the #1 team with the #1 defense on the road. There's no such thing as a perfectly officiated game. But even if this game was perfectly officiated...A&M doesn't win.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by captain planet View Post
                              Agreed.

                              And michigan shouldn't be in the top 10. They haven't played anybody. Go Illini!
                              Ha!!!!!

                              I'm just getting caught up here.

                              They only beat PSU 49 - 10
                              / \

                              Former boats:
                              2003 Prostar 197 35th Anniversary
                              1990 Prostar 190

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by shepherd View Post
                                Ha!!!!!

                                I'm just getting caught up here.

                                They only beat PSU 49 - 10
                                Quit stating facts. Buckeyes cant deal with facts Shep.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎